Head to head

smart #3 vs Škoda Enyaq

A side-by-side comparison of published UK specifications, including WLTP range figures.

This comparison is generated automatically from published manufacturer specifications, not from hands-on testing. It sets the two cars' figures side by side; it is not a road test.

Car A

smart #3 electric car

smart #3

From £38,000 · 265 miles

Read the smart #3 review

Car B

Škoda Enyaq electric car

Škoda Enyaq

From £39,000 · 265 miles

Read the Škoda Enyaq review

The verdict

Both cars quote the same 265-mile WLTP range, so range alone won't separate them. The Škoda Enyaq is the better fit for families needing extra boot space, with 585 litres and 5 seats versus 370 litres and 5 in the smart #3. On price the smart #3 starts about £1,000 lower, while the quicker of the two to 60mph is the smart #3 at 5.8s.

On the measured specifications below, the smart #3 leads in 2 areas and the Škoda Enyaq in 2.

Specs side by side

Price from (new)(Lower is better)

smart #3£38,000
Škoda Enyaq£39,000

Range (WLTP)

smart #3265 miles
Škoda Enyaq265 miles

Battery

smart #366 kWh
Škoda Enyaq77 kWh

Body type

smart #3SUV
Škoda EnyaqSUV

Seats

smart #35
Škoda Enyaq5

Boot space

smart #3370 litres
Škoda Enyaq585 litres

0–60 mph(Lower is better)

smart #35.8s
Škoda Enyaq6.7s

Standout feature

smart #3Coupe-SUV with Mercedes-designed interior
Škoda EnyaqOne of the most spacious family EVs you can buy

How they score

Each attribute is a percentile against every EV on sale in the UK — 100 means best in the dataset. These are the same attributes our recommender uses.

Range

smart #346/100
Škoda Enyaq46/100

Price

smart #364/100
Škoda Enyaq60/100

Family space

smart #321/100
Škoda Enyaq84/100

Performance

smart #364/100
Škoda Enyaq41/100

Tech

smart #334/100
Škoda Enyaq15/100

Other comparisons