Head to head

smart #3 vs Škoda Enyaq

A side-by-side comparison of published UK specifications, including WLTP range figures.

This comparison is generated automatically from published manufacturer specifications, not from hands-on testing. It sets the two cars' figures side by side; it is not a road test.

Car A

smart #3 electric car photographed from the front three-quarter angle, 265 miles of range

smart #3

From £38,000 · 265 miles

Read the smart #3 review

Car B

Škoda Enyaq electric car photographed from the front three-quarter angle, 265 miles of range

Škoda Enyaq

From £39,000 · 265 miles

Read the Škoda Enyaq review

The verdict

Both cars quote the same 265 miles WLTP range, so range alone won’t separate them. The Škoda Enyaq is the better fit for families needing extra boot space, with 585 litres and 5 seats versus 370 litres and 5 in the smart #3. On price the smart #3 starts about £1,000 lower, while the quicker of the two off the line is the smart #3 at 5.8s.

On the measured specifications below, the smart #3 leads in 2 areas and the Škoda Enyaq in 2.

Specs side by side

Price from (new)(Lower is better)

smart #3£38,000
Škoda Enyaq£39,000

Range (WLTP)

smart #3265 miles
Škoda Enyaq265 miles

Battery

smart #366 kWh
Škoda Enyaq77 kWh

Body type

smart #3SUV
Škoda EnyaqSUV

Seats

smart #35
Škoda Enyaq5

Boot space

smart #3370 litres
Škoda Enyaq585 litres

0–60 mph(Lower is better)

smart #35.8s
Škoda Enyaq6.7s

Standout feature

smart #3Coupe-SUV with Mercedes-designed interior
Škoda EnyaqOne of the most spacious family EVs you can buy

How they score

Each attribute is a percentile against every EV on sale in UK — 100 means best in the dataset. These are the same attributes our recommender uses.

Range

smart #346/100
Škoda Enyaq46/100

Price

smart #364/100
Škoda Enyaq60/100

Family space

smart #321/100
Škoda Enyaq84/100

Performance

smart #364/100
Škoda Enyaq41/100

Tech

smart #334/100
Škoda Enyaq15/100

Other comparisons