Head to head

Audi Q4 e-tron vs BYD Sealion 7

A side-by-side comparison of published UK specifications, including WLTP range figures.

This comparison is generated automatically from published manufacturer specifications, not from hands-on testing. It sets the two cars' figures side by side; it is not a road test.

Car A

Audi Q4 e-tron electric car

Audi Q4 e-tron

From £45,000 · 265 miles

Read the Audi Q4 e-tron review

Car B

BYD Sealion 7 electric car

BYD Sealion 7

From £45,000 · 270 miles

Read the BYD Sealion 7 review

The verdict

The BYD Sealion 7 offers more range — 270 miles WLTP against 265, a gap of about 5 miles between charges. The Audi Q4 e-tron is the better fit for families needing extra boot space, with 520 litres and 5 seats versus 500 litres and 5 in the BYD Sealion 7. Prices start at the same figure, so the deciding factors are boot space, pace (4.5s plays 6.2s to 60mph) and which standout feature matters more to you.

On the measured specifications below, the Audi Q4 e-tron leads in 1 area and the BYD Sealion 7 in 3.

Specs side by side

Price from (new)(Lower is better)

Audi Q4 e-tron£45,000
BYD Sealion 7£45,000

Range (WLTP)

Audi Q4 e-tron265 miles
BYD Sealion 7270 miles

Battery

Audi Q4 e-tron77 kWh
BYD Sealion 782.5 kWh

Body type

Audi Q4 e-tronSUV
BYD Sealion 7SUV

Seats

Audi Q4 e-tron5
BYD Sealion 75

Boot space

Audi Q4 e-tron520 litres
BYD Sealion 7500 litres

0–60 mph(Lower is better)

Audi Q4 e-tron6.2s
BYD Sealion 74.5s

Standout feature

Audi Q4 e-tronPremium family SUV with a big, square boot
BYD Sealion 7Quick, comfortable and generously equipped

How they score

Each attribute is a percentile against every EV on sale in the UK — 100 means best in the dataset. These are the same attributes our recommender uses.

Range

Audi Q4 e-tron46/100
BYD Sealion 751/100

Price

Audi Q4 e-tron45/100
BYD Sealion 745/100

Family space

Audi Q4 e-tron65/100
BYD Sealion 759/100

Performance

Audi Q4 e-tron53/100
BYD Sealion 787/100

Tech

Audi Q4 e-tron34/100
BYD Sealion 734/100

Other comparisons