Head to head

Volvo EX90 vs Tesla Model X

A side-by-side comparison of published Australian specifications, including WLTP range figures.

This comparison is generated automatically from published manufacturer specifications, not from hands-on testing. It sets the two cars' figures side by side; it is not a road test.

Car A

Volvo EX90 electric car photographed from the front three-quarter angle, 530 km of range

Volvo EX90

From A$196,800 Β· 530 km

Read the Volvo EX90 review

Car B

Tesla Model X electric car photographed from the front three-quarter angle, 530 km of range

Tesla Model X

From A$184,500 Β· 530 km

Read the Tesla Model X review

The verdict

Both cars quote the same 530 km WLTP range, so range alone won’t separate them. The Volvo EX90 is the better fit for families needing extra boot space, with 655 litres and 7 seats versus 357 litres and 7 in the Tesla Model X. On price the Tesla Model X starts about A$12,300 lower, while the quicker of the two off the line is the Tesla Model X at 3.8s.

On the measured specifications below, the Volvo EX90 leads in 2 areas and the Tesla Model X in 2.

Specs side by side

Price from (new)(Lower is better)

Volvo EX90A$196,800
Tesla Model XA$184,500

Range (WLTP)

Volvo EX90530 km
Tesla Model X530 km

Battery

Volvo EX90111 kWh
Tesla Model X100 kWh

Body type

Volvo EX90SUV
Tesla Model XSUV

Seats

Volvo EX907
Tesla Model X7

Boot space

Volvo EX90655 litres
Tesla Model X357 litres

0–100 km/h(Lower is better)

Volvo EX904.7s
Tesla Model X3.8s

Standout feature

Volvo EX90Seven seats, lidar and a beautifully calm cabin
Tesla Model XFalcon doors and up to seven seats

How they score

Each attribute is a percentile against every EV on sale in Australia β€” 100 means best in the dataset. These are the same attributes our recommender uses.

Range

Volvo EX9084/100
Tesla Model X84/100

Price

Volvo EX904/100
Tesla Model X7/100

Family space

Volvo EX9095/100
Tesla Model X30/100

Performance

Volvo EX9079/100
Tesla Model X89/100

Tech

Volvo EX9086/100
Tesla Model X86/100

Other comparisons