Head to head

Tesla Model X vs Volvo EX90

A side-by-side comparison of published Australian specifications, including WLTP range figures.

This comparison is generated automatically from published manufacturer specifications, not from hands-on testing. It sets the two cars' figures side by side; it is not a road test.

Car A

Tesla Model X electric car photographed from the front three-quarter angle, 530 km of range

Tesla Model X

From A$184,500 Β· 530 km

Read the Tesla Model X review

Car B

Volvo EX90 electric car photographed from the front three-quarter angle, 530 km of range

Volvo EX90

From A$196,800 Β· 530 km

Read the Volvo EX90 review

The verdict

Both cars quote the same 530 km WLTP range, so range alone won’t separate them. The Volvo EX90 is the better fit for families needing extra boot space, with 655 litres and 7 seats versus 357 litres and 7 in the Tesla Model X. On price the Tesla Model X starts about A$12,300 lower, while the quicker of the two off the line is the Tesla Model X at 3.8s.

On the measured specifications below, the Tesla Model X leads in 2 areas and the Volvo EX90 in 2.

Specs side by side

Price from (new)(Lower is better)

Tesla Model XA$184,500
Volvo EX90A$196,800

Range (WLTP)

Tesla Model X530 km
Volvo EX90530 km

Battery

Tesla Model X100 kWh
Volvo EX90111 kWh

Body type

Tesla Model XSUV
Volvo EX90SUV

Seats

Tesla Model X7
Volvo EX907

Boot space

Tesla Model X357 litres
Volvo EX90655 litres

0–100 km/h(Lower is better)

Tesla Model X3.8s
Volvo EX904.7s

Standout feature

Tesla Model XFalcon doors and up to seven seats
Volvo EX90Seven seats, lidar and a beautifully calm cabin

How they score

Each attribute is a percentile against every EV on sale in Australia β€” 100 means best in the dataset. These are the same attributes our recommender uses.

Range

Tesla Model X84/100
Volvo EX9084/100

Price

Tesla Model X7/100
Volvo EX904/100

Family space

Tesla Model X30/100
Volvo EX9095/100

Performance

Tesla Model X89/100
Volvo EX9079/100

Tech

Tesla Model X86/100
Volvo EX9086/100

Other comparisons