Head to head

smart #3 vs Nissan Ariya

A side-by-side comparison of published Australian specifications, including WLTP range figures.

This comparison is generated automatically from published manufacturer specifications, not from hands-on testing. It sets the two cars' figures side by side; it is not a road test.

Car A

smart #3 electric car photographed from the front three-quarter angle, 425 km of range

smart #3

From A$77,900 Β· 425 km

Read the smart #3 review

Car B

Nissan Ariya electric car photographed from the front three-quarter angle, 435 km of range

Nissan Ariya

From A$79,950 Β· 435 km

Read the Nissan Ariya review

The verdict

The Nissan Ariya offers more range β€” 435 km WLTP against 425 km, a gap of about 10 km between charges. The Nissan Ariya is the better fit for families needing extra boot space, with 466 litres and 5 seats versus 370 litres and 5 in the smart #3. On price the smart #3 starts about A$2,050 lower, while the quicker of the two off the line is the Nissan Ariya at 5.7s.

On the measured specifications below, the smart #3 leads in 1 area and the Nissan Ariya in 4.

Specs side by side

Price from (new)(Lower is better)

smart #3A$77,900
Nissan AriyaA$79,950

Range (WLTP)

smart #3425 km
Nissan Ariya435 km

Battery

smart #366 kWh
Nissan Ariya87 kWh

Body type

smart #3SUV
Nissan AriyaSUV

Seats

smart #35
Nissan Ariya5

Boot space

smart #3370 litres
Nissan Ariya466 litres

0–100 km/h(Lower is better)

smart #35.8s
Nissan Ariya5.7s

Standout feature

smart #3Coupe-SUV with Mercedes-designed interior
Nissan AriyaLounge-like cabin with a sliding centre console

How they score

Each attribute is a percentile against every EV on sale in Australia β€” 100 means best in the dataset. These are the same attributes our recommender uses.

Range

smart #338/100
Nissan Ariya47/100

Price

smart #375/100
Nissan Ariya71/100

Family space

smart #316/100
Nissan Ariya45/100

Performance

smart #353/100
Nissan Ariya55/100

Tech

smart #322/100
Nissan Ariya22/100

Other comparisons