Head to head

Škoda Enyaq vs smart #3

A side-by-side comparison of published Australian specifications, including WLTP range figures.

This comparison is generated automatically from published manufacturer specifications, not from hands-on testing. It sets the two cars' figures side by side; it is not a road test.

Car A

Škoda Enyaq electric car photographed from the front three-quarter angle, 425 km of range

Škoda Enyaq

From A$79,950 · 425 km

Read the Škoda Enyaq review

Car B

smart #3 electric car photographed from the front three-quarter angle, 425 km of range

smart #3

From A$77,900 · 425 km

Read the smart #3 review

The verdict

Both cars quote the same 425 km WLTP range, so range alone won’t separate them. The Škoda Enyaq is the better fit for families needing extra boot space, with 585 litres and 5 seats versus 370 litres and 5 in the smart #3. On price the smart #3 starts about A$2,050 lower, while the quicker of the two off the line is the smart #3 at 5.8s.

On the measured specifications below, the Škoda Enyaq leads in 2 areas and the smart #3 in 2.

Specs side by side

Price from (new)(Lower is better)

Škoda EnyaqA$79,950
smart #3A$77,900

Range (WLTP)

Škoda Enyaq425 km
smart #3425 km

Battery

Škoda Enyaq77 kWh
smart #366 kWh

Body type

Škoda EnyaqSUV
smart #3SUV

Seats

Škoda Enyaq5
smart #35

Boot space

Škoda Enyaq585 litres
smart #3370 litres

0–100 km/h(Lower is better)

Škoda Enyaq6.7s
smart #35.8s

Standout feature

Škoda EnyaqOne of the most spacious family EVs you can buy
smart #3Coupe-SUV with Mercedes-designed interior

How they score

Each attribute is a percentile against every EV on sale in Australia — 100 means best in the dataset. These are the same attributes our recommender uses.

Range

Škoda Enyaq38/100
smart #338/100

Price

Škoda Enyaq71/100
smart #375/100

Family space

Škoda Enyaq86/100
smart #316/100

Performance

Škoda Enyaq27/100
smart #353/100

Tech

Škoda Enyaq4/100
smart #322/100

Other comparisons