Head to head
BYD Atto 3 vs Kia Niro EV
A side-by-side comparison of published Australian specifications, including WLTP range figures.
The verdict
The Kia Niro EV offers more range — 385 km WLTP against 345 km, a gap of about 40 km between charges. The Kia Niro EV is the better fit for families needing extra boot space, with 475 litres and 5 seats versus 440 litres and 5 in the BYD Atto 3. On price the Kia Niro EV starts about A$3,450 lower, while the quicker of the two off the line is the BYD Atto 3 at 7.3s.
On the measured specifications below, the BYD Atto 3 leads in 1 area and the Kia Niro EV in 4.
Specs side by side
Price from (new)(Lower is better)
Range (WLTP)
Battery
Body type
Seats
Boot space
0–100 km/h(Lower is better)
Standout feature
How they score
Each attribute is a percentile against every EV on sale in Australia — 100 means best in the dataset. These are the same attributes our recommender uses.
Range
Price
Family space
Performance
Tech